Friday, January 23, 2009

Activation-synthesis hypothesis

As I begin to write this I am extremely sleepy because of only getting around four hours of sleep. Because of this I fully understand the importance of sleep due to how I feel, but I wonder why we dream and what causes them. Some direction into these answers have been provided in some of my most recent reading, a productive contribution of text called The New Science of Dreaming. Along with the reading I have also purchased a video called Dream Debate which features Allen Hobson and Mark Solms.

In this newest post I would like to feature one of the well known and supported theories of why we dream. In later posts I will explore on other theories as well as my own dream theory. The first one is called Activation-synthesis hypothesis.

Activation-synthesis hypothesis:

The activation synthesis hypothesis was conceived because of a number of studies done by Dr. Allen Hobson and fellow scientist that were actively involved in neuroscience. The theory is based on the concept that during the phases of sleep our brains are actively involved in either activating or deactivating different parts of our brains. The activation aspect of the dreaming process is theorized as being random and experienced in the forebrain that starts this process in the pontine brainstems ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) during the REM sleep stage (Barrett & McNamara, 2007). This evidence of demodulation and activation is greatly supported with PET scans as well as Dr. Hobson’s own creation of the “Night Cap” which oddly enough does a good job in determining patents REM episodes by only measuring head and eye movements (Hameroff, 2006). Understanding that the forebrain is a large portion of the brain, it’s somewhat misleading to believe that there is only activation happening during the REM and other sleep stages that cause us to dream.

Though I somewhat agree with Dr. Hobson’s theory (which I will explain further into the post) in reality many different portions of the forebrain show evidence in PET scans of activation as well as deactivation. The amygdale for one is theorized to be highly active during REM sleep due to the anxiety as well as aggression that are produced during sleep; the amygdale plays a key role in our waking fear responses. Another key player in our dreams is the forgetfulness of our experiences, explained by the demodulation of the prefrontal Cortex (PFC) during REM. As stated by Dr. Hobson during the debate, the key components for longer term memory is the combination of serotonin and dopamine; in the absence of serotonin, nothing new can be learned. Serotonin shows evidence as to be a demodulator of REM sleep as acetylcholine is an activator. In REM sleep the dopamineic area of our forebrain remains as activated as it is during waking state. If all the above evidence is true it would make a logical explanation of why we forget dreams as we are unable to process them into our long term memory in REM sleep. In short the demodulation of the PFC containing the serotonin neurotransmitter could allow the transition from NREM and REM stages of sleep. It also would explain why we forget our dreams the majority of the time, since we realistically dream multiple times a night. The last dream of the night would be remembered for a short term (since most of us are awoken during this time) and possibly passed into our long term memory as PFC activation is back to its normal waking state.

Not to discredit Dr. Allen Hobson’s theory, he oddly is a professor of psychiatry and seems to reply much of his information on neuroscience. He also actively disagrees with Sigmund Freud theories for dream interpretations as Dr. Hobson’s theory is based on the random activation of the forebrain. Dr. Hobson disagrees with Freud because of the bases that Freud theorized that our dreams are subconscious needs from our infant pasts. Freud also mentions that we forget as well are paralyzed during our sleep in order to protect ourselves from remembering these needs. Dr. Hobson theorizes the randomness of dreams are meaningless and are based on chemical reactions as well as the interpretations of our outside influences or association called attractors (something I will go into later). Though I agree with Dr. Hobson’s theory of activation and deactivation explaining the bizarreness of our dreams, I still respect the concepts of subconscious wants and needs influencing our dreams. I tend to also believe that Dr. Hobson’s theory of activation of the forebrain is a very generalized theory and should be narrowed down.

References:

Barrett, D., & McNamara, P. (2007). The New Science of Dreaming. Praeger Publishers.
Hameroff, M. B. (Director). (2006). Dream Debate [Motion Picture].

-L

15 comments:

  1. Thanks for the review! I want to say - thank you for this!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks very much for this useful blog post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Many thanks for the help in this question, now I will not commit such error.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excellent! Generally I never study total posts but the way you wrote this data is purely incredible and also this kept my interest in reading and I liked it. You've got obtained great composing ability.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Purchase Valium no prescription online. valium no prescription, MfY5SzuEc3

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like your site! This is my page

    ReplyDelete
  7. I enjoyed viewing your blog and I will be back to check it more in the future so please keep up your good quality work. I love the colors that you chose, you are quite talented!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Weird... I just found your site by searching for 'squirrel torture' on Google! Boss Office Chair

    ReplyDelete